Fox Chapel High: Where it’s OK to dress as an alien(ator)

Blogged under El Web Mundial, Pittsburgh, School by libcat on Saturday 19 November 2005 at 3:31 pm

On the Friday morning before Halloween, 10 to 15 students, all of whom are residents of the Fox Chapel area’s most affluent neighborhoods, marched into school dressed as students from Sharpsburg, a less wealthy neighborhood [in] which a minority of Fox Chapel Area High School students live.

… And it was tolerated by the administration.

Fox Chapel High: Where it’s OK to dress as an alien(ator)

The best kind.

Blogged under El Web Mundial, Humor, Libraries, Quotations by libcat on Friday 26 August 2005 at 1:21 pm

If television’s a babysitter, the internet’s a drunk librarian who won’t shut up.

I must drink beer.

Blogged under Assorted, El Web Mundial, Politics by libcat on Sunday 14 August 2005 at 7:29 pm

LIKE the Japanese soldier marooned on an island for years after V-J Day, President Bush may be the last person in the country to learn that for Americans, if not Iraqis, the war in Iraq is over. “We will stay the course,” he insistently tells us from his Texas ranch. What do you mean we, white man?

Frank Rich rocks. (NYT)


Work has been so boring the last three days, I’ve done almost nothing but read Goats. I’ve now made it through three years of the archives—only five and a half years left to catch up. . . .

Don’t miss the Litany of Beer.

Spam that makes you say “Huh?!?”

Blogged under Humor, Quotations, spam by libcat on Wednesday 22 June 2005 at 9:04 am

Message received this morning from “your manager, Selma” (one of those things I always wanted, and never knew I already had….):

You forgot to take this nice bagatelle!
We have the best prices for all things every boy needs!
Its possible to take it on-line!
Youll get it immediately!
The super quality is guaranteed!
[1][web address redacted]
You deserve the best. All is pay less.
Be deleted:
[2][web address redacted]
Best, Regards,
Selma

Assorted 3

Blogged under Assorted, El Web Mundial, Libraries by libcat on Sunday 12 June 2005 at 12:51 pm

Most of these come from LISNews:

  • CAIR: Explore the Quran:

    In today’s climate of heightened religious sensitivities and apparent cultural clashes, now is the time for people of all faiths to better acquaint themselves with Islam’s sacred text, the Holy Quran.

    The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is proud to announce a new campaign intended to promote understanding of the Quran by distributing complimentary copies to any interested member of the American public. This campaign, titled Explore the Qur’an, serves as a response to those who would defame and desecrate the holy book of Muslims without full knowledge of its teachings.

    The mission of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is to enhance understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding.

  • Religion News Service is a secular news and photo service devoted to unbiased coverage of religion and ethics. They appear to be primarily a e-mail and wire based service, as they’ve only got a sentence with each headline on the main page, and none of them are linked. But there are links to “Search RNS Now!

    But if you’re using Opera, you get the page mirrored here: Your Browser is Not Allowed at this site, in very large type. Period.

    Well, fuck you, too.

    The “Browser Wars” were over nearly 7 years ago. We were supposed to be done with that “best viewed in [Browser X]” crap years ago (Well, except for trying to convince people to drop Netscape 4, the 8-year-old dinosaur so far decayed it’s starting to turn to petroleum….). As World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee wrote 9 years ago,

    Anyone who slaps a ‘this page is best viewed with Browser X’ label on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another computer, another word processor, or another network. (Technology Review, July 1996)

    Besides all which… that’s just rude. “Your Browser is Not Allowed”. You Have Not Said the Magic Word. You Have Been Denied.

    Best Viewed with A BRAIN!

     

    Anyway, now that I’ve gotten that out of my system, more library stories:

  • According to the International Herald-Tribune, a group of German publishers, especially smaller- and medium-sized houses, are considering creating a Google Print-like project for a digital index of their books.

    We have to decide whether distribution is in the hands of a few global distributors and global publishing houses, said [Matthias] Ulmer, who heads Eugen Ulmer Verlag, a medium-size publishing house in Stuttgart. Publishers and booksellers that are involved, he said, feel that if they don’t do this today, they may no longer exist in some years.

  • Shortly before Memorial Day, the California Assembly passed a bill that would ban public school districts from purchasing textbooks longer than 200 pages. The bill was sponsored by an Assemblywoman from Los Angeles, the Democratic chair of the Education Committee in the house, who claims that rather than reading specified pages from a manual, the work world students will be graduating to now requires more that personnel be able to find information online, on their own. The bill requires key points and basic ideas to be condensed into the 200 pages, with appendexes listing website addresses suggested as starting points for further research. (AB 756) says don’t give students a predigested version of what U.S. history is, let them explore the Smithsonian and the Library of Congress, its sponsor said.

    The executive director of the California School Library Association responded, What we’re finding more and more is that people are saying, ‘Who needs an encyclopedia? Who needs an almanac? Just go to the Internet, it’s all there.’ Well, it’s not all there. Neither the state public schools Superintendent nor the Governor, nor various education groups, have taken positions on the bill, which now goes to the State Senate.

    (Sacramento Bee, via Scripps-McClatchy Western Service, via LISNews.com)

    Although I feel less opposed than when I first read it, there are definitely a number of problems with this idea:

    • First and foremost, access to computers and the internet. There’s still a substantial number of families that don’t have a computer, let alone internet access, in their home, and school and public libraries don’t have the facilities, staff (California’s public schools have the lowest ratio of professional school librarians to students in the country), or open hours to take all those kids. And of course, the areas with the largest numbers of kids who don’t have access to the internet at home will also be the ones where the school libraries are understaffed and underresourced (did i just invent that word?) and the public libraries have short hours and few facilities—if there are any at all.
    • Secondly, math and sciences.

      It’s still very difficult to work with math and sciences, especially post-algebraic math, in HTML. To represent mathematical texts requires one of a number of differently distateful solutions; the most popular are to create images of the equations (lots of files to download, poor quality) and to create PDF or similar files of the text. . . . which not only requires massive downloads (and massive plugins), but pretty much puts us back where we started.

    • Third: standards, community, educational, and political.
      [Y]ou’d have to know how aligned the materials are on the Internet with our education standards, said Michael Kirst, a Stanford education professor and co-director of Policy Analysis for Education.

      If we’re giving students a list of sites to visit in the back of the book—according to the bill, books would have to provide a rich appendix with Web sites where students can go for more information—how is that better than just putting the information in the book? Ok, we teach them how to enter an address in an address bar. That should be part of a keyboarding or basic computer skills course.

      On the other hand, they could give kids sites as ’starters’, take-off points, for further research. But then you have to teach kids to recognise what’s real on the web and what’s not. And given the number of people who fall for bank scams, viruses, and worms, are any of us ones to talk? Keeping kids from falling prey to malware and bad information seems like something that will take a hell of a lot more time and energy than it seems like anyone’s got to give in California these days.

Proudly powered by Wordpress - Theme Triplets Identification band, the boyish style by neuro